x
Excellent site
X
x
All of the above are excellent sources for information
X
David Lohr’s account of Anthony Timeline
from investigation.discovery.com
June 1 to June 14
June 15 to June 21
June 24 to June 30
July 3 to July 7
July 15 to July 21
July 22 to July 27
July 28 to July 31
August 1 to August 5
August 6 to August 10
August 11 to August 15
August 16 to August 25
August 26 to September 2
September 2 to September 9
September 10 to September 16
September 17 to September 23
September 24 to September 30
October 1 to October 10
October 11 to October 17
October 18 to November 10
November 11 to December 01
December 02 to December 31
January 01 to January 31, 2009
February 01 to February 31, 2009
March 01 to March 31, 2009
April 01 to June 31, 2009
July 01 to July 31, 2009
If you find a better timeline, please let me know.
38 responses so far ↓
michellefrommadison // February 20, 2009 at 2:37 pm
I saw a funny picture of Nancy disGrace with the following comment placed into the picture. It reads “Every time a child is murdered, Nancy Grace has an orgasm.” Just hilarious, yet probably so accurate. She thrives on victimizing real victims of crimes. Since Nancy was never a victim of any crime in her lifetime, she remains clue-less to the damage she does to real actual victims of crimes.
Marinade Dave // February 20, 2009 at 2:44 pm
Gee, michellefrommadison, I kind of liked Nasty Grace myself. She’s certainly no fan of the Anthonys, that’s for sure. Nor the Duckett’s, whose lawsuit against her is still in litigation. She does know how to victimize, but is she really all that different from circus sideshows of old? She’s just updated it, but it still sounds like carnival barking. Step right up for the show of your life! Hey, that’s a part of life, I guess.
Thank you for dropping by and leaving your comment. I like your gravatar.
michellefrommadison // February 20, 2009 at 2:56 pm
Thanks Marinade Dave, I love your site too. You are impressingly thorough in your work, I love it
Marinade Dave // February 20, 2009 at 3:04 pm
Well, thank you, michellefrommadison. I’m very happy you’re happy. I never even knew you were here. Impressively thorough… now that made my day!
Weezie // February 20, 2009 at 4:08 pm
michellfrommadison; I beg to differ. Nancy Grace is a victim, of sorts. Her fiancee was murdered, two weeks before she was to get married. I believe that constitutes as a victim of crime. Just so you know, she has been bitten by it, and so it never leaves her soul.
Weezie
Marinade Dave // February 20, 2009 at 4:40 pm
I can understand your position and michellfrommadison’s. Both Nancy Grace and the Anthonys were victims. If anything, I would think that victims of crime would be more sympathetic.
michellefrommadison // February 20, 2009 at 5:03 pm
Well, Weezie, you can beg all you want, it still doesn’t change the fact that Nancy Grace was never a victim of any crime in her entire long lifetime. Facts are the facts. Now, her former fiance was a victim of a crime. Keith was the victim of a murder, not Nancy, she is still alive the last time I checked. Nancy changed guys back in that period of time like most people change their socks. Her currant husband is only around after she paid him to get married, according to several CNN employees so that she could present a more wholesome appearance in one of her many lawsuits filed against this Predator. I agree with you that Nancy was likely bitten by something; perhaps mental illness.
Weezie // February 20, 2009 at 5:15 pm
whoooooo Michelle; didn’t know you could hate someone that much. As far as I know, anyone who looses someone to a crime is also a victim NO? Not that I am trying to stand up for NG, but she did suffer a loss here. I have not gone through that, and I hope I will never have to either. Give her a bit of slack. I mean she is in her chair making wads of dough ray me, not because she is a victim, she just happens to ignite the juices in people; like they want to throw something at their t.v.’s, because they think she is so rude. That’s what she gets paid for.
Weezie
michellefrommadison // February 20, 2009 at 5:51 pm
Whoooooo Weezie; I don’t hate anyone, contrary to your misstatement. No one that knows a person that is a victim of a crime, does not make that person also a victim of that crime. That’s ludicrous! In Nancy Grace’s case, that crime in which she refers to, Keith was the victim, not Nancy. There was a person sentenced for that crime because that person made a victim out of Keith, not Nancy. Keith is dead because of that crime, and Nancy is not dead from that crime because she was in a different state at the time of that murder and Nancy was not the victim. And, I don’t think Nancy suffered any lose, ever. Not even with Keith being murdered. Listen, if you research her track record you will understand that Nancy was a bit of a tramp back then. The only slack for Nancy that many victims would like to see is a little bit of slack in a noose, just before it becomes ridged. What I really think she is paid for is to be a journalist that covers cases of crimes involving missing children and other stories where her show can assist in getting the word out to help locate missing people, and nothing more than that. But, instead, Nancy chooses to victimize victims of crimes and always makes assertions without knowing or even investigating the facts first before she spews her filth. It’s no wonder that those twins she bought, Nancy is still not allowed to be alone with them unsupervised according to that CNN employee.
Weezie // February 20, 2009 at 10:23 pm
I don’t believe I misstated your hate. Just read your prose. Where do you get your facts ? From CNN. Well I hate to tell you but HLN and CNN are owned by the same network, so I doubt they would be spreading those kinds of rumours about Nancy. In any case, you and I disagree about NG, so let’s leave it at that, unless you want to continue a fruitless argument.
Weezie
Anonymous // August 14, 2009 at 12:24 pm
Dave, you know I am a nag about Tony Lazzaro. Since
we now remember Tony stated on September 22, 2008
the last time he saw Caylee was June 12th should it be
added here? He bothers me because too many times his
story changed as “it just slipped his mind” I hope you
leave this on for awhile because I wou;ld like to review
again more thoroughly and print out. Thanks
Marinade Dave // August 14, 2009 at 1:17 pm
I guess I could update this timeline from where it stands now, but I haven’t gotten around to it yet. I think one of Lazzaro’s roommates said Casey brought Caylee into the lounge one of those last nights she was alive and everyone thought it was so inappropriate. I’ll have to find that interview, but I need to remember who it was first.
snoopysleuth // August 14, 2009 at 1:57 pm
Dave~~this is my first trip in this thread. It does look like and update is due. Some of the early interviews with Casey’s friends were not quite accurate re the times. They were trying to piece things together from their recollection of a month ago or more.
Marinade Dave // August 14, 2009 at 2:00 pm
I’ll have to find one that reflects the latest information, but I do have those two new links at the top of this page. By the way, I won’t be able to attend the hearing next week. It is at 9:30am, so I heard, and I have a telephone interview with my attorney that morning at 11:00am. Drat, but I’m sure there will be more.
Weezie10 // August 14, 2009 at 2:32 pm
I was wandering through the chronological events above and found this rather disturbing:
July 12
After they had not seen Caylee for some time, the girl’s grandparents got concerned and confronted Casey, convincing her to go to the sheriff’s office.
July 15
The Sheriff’s Office is notified that Caylee Anthony has been missing since June 9.
What happened during July 13, 14 and the better part of the 15th.
Why the delay in calling the Sheriff’s office?
George and Cindy spent 2 1/2 days discussing what they should do? and George is an ex cop.!
Good grief, what is the Prosectuion going to make of that timeline in terms of ;
1)Did they know that Caylee was missing since the 12th, and were trying to cover Casey’s tracks?
2)Why the delay in calling the S.Office?
3)Were they communication with Casey during those 2 1/2 days?
Something isn’t right about that.
Marinade Dave // August 14, 2009 at 2:44 pm
Don’t go by this timeline now, Weezie. I’m searching for a better, more up to date one.
snoopysleuth // August 14, 2009 at 2:46 pm
Weezie~~most all of those timelines are out of whack. They all need to be scrapped and a new thread started with just the links. Here is the best timeline that I have found so far. There are only a few mistakes in this one.
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread431159/pg1
Marinade Dave // August 14, 2009 at 2:51 pm
Yes, that one is very good and that’s why I listed it at the top of this timeline page.
Weezie10 // August 14, 2009 at 3:51 pm
Thanks Dave. I’m just going through what you sent. Now here’s something to ponder:
From ping map produced by Websleuths here for KC’s cell phone activity on 06/18/08, it appears KC was in the area of the Anthony home/LA home/location where remains would be found between 2:42 pm and 4:10 pm (Pings 10-12).
12:34 pm KC attempts to call CA’s cell phone.
12:35 pm KC attempts to call Anthony home.
12:36 pm KC attempts to call GA’s cell phone.
12:36 pm KC attempts to call GA’s cell phone. (23 seconds after last call)
1:09 pm KC calls CA’s cell phone, 1.5 minute duration.
1:11 pm KC attempts to call Anthony home.
4:27 pm Maria Kishh calls KC, 1.2 minute duration.
No activity on phone for 2 hours and 12 minutes.
6:39 pm KC calls CA’s cell phone, 7.6 minute conversation.
6:55 pm Anthony home leaves voicemail on KC’s cell.
6:55 pm KC calls voicemail.
6:57 pm KC calls Anthony home, 2.6 minute conversation. (Last cell phone activity on 6/18).
No activity on phone for 17 hours and 14 minutes.
(That would mean KC never used her phone till NOON THE NEXT DAY! and that has never happened before). There was a lot of communication from KC to Anthony’s on the 18th. Do you think that implies something?
When you start disecting the time of the calls you can start to put some pieces together. I also think there is more to the pool situation than has been reported. I think we will see this as an important link along with the timeline of Cindy finding the ladder down and not where it belonged. JMO
Marinade Dave // August 14, 2009 at 4:02 pm
Weezie – I know that Caylee was last seen on the 16th and Casey was home that morning. It means that Caylee must have died on the 16th since Casey was at Lazzaro’s apartment and Blockbuster that night.
The afternoon calls on the 18th to G&C could imply that Casey was making sure no one was home. That was the day she borrowed the shovel from neighbor Brian Burner, I believe. The lack of any cell phone activity from 7pm on (18 June) could mean a number of things. She turned her phone off because she didn’t want to talk to her family, she was trying to dispose of the body, or she was intimate with Lazzaro the rest of the night. I guess there are other possibilities, as well. Perhaps her battery went dead and she forgot her charger. I don’t know, but it’s open for discussion.
Weezie10 // August 14, 2009 at 4:05 pm
Good one Dave. The shovel incident was the following day, (19th), according to the neighbours best recollection. That was also the day she backed into the driveway. She returned the shovel 2 hours later.
Weezie10 // August 14, 2009 at 4:26 pm
June 17th
BB sees KC back her car into the garage. This was something KC normally did not do. She normally pulled in forward and parked in the driveway.
CA, upon arriving home from work, finds back gate open and ladder in pool. Calls GA to confirm he had not left the ladder in the pool because they always put the ladder away so that Caylee cannot climb it and fall in pool. Also finds pool supply box moved next to pool. [NOTE: While GA did share the ladder incident with LE in one of his interviews, he is unable to nail down the date with any certainty (or even close). However, GA and CA are quite firm on the date when they are interviewed by Greta at their home. They also convey this date with certainty to MF during a meeting they have with him.]
From ping map produced by Websleuths here for KC’s cell phone activity on 06/17/08, KC appears to have stayed at TL’s apartment until around 2:20 pm (Pings 1-3). She then is in the Anthony home/LA home/location where remains would be found area until as late as 4:30 pm (Pings 4-9). She is then very near AR’s home and Jay Blanchard Park area from 4:36 pm (Ping 9A, 10) to at least 6:31 pm (Hess gas station receipt provided by TL). There are no cell phone pings from 5:23 pm to 8:23 pm. From 8:23 pm on she is at TL’s apartment (Pings 11-12).
I THINK IT HAPPENED ON THE 17th.
Marinade Dave // August 14, 2009 at 4:31 pm
Then where did Caylee spend the night of the 16th? Don’t say she spent the afternoon in the trunk because she would have been dead in an hour. Still the 16th.
Weezie10 // August 14, 2009 at 4:34 pm
Either at Lazarro’s or the Anthony’s. Nowhere have George or Cindy stated where Caylee was that night and Lazarro’s memory could be not that great either. Just seems more plausible that most of the activity re phone calls and where Casey was, puts it to the 17th.
Don’t be mad, I’m trying to sleuth it too.
Marinade Dave // August 14, 2009 at 4:40 pm
Wait a second, Weezie. Just because George and Cindy said they did not see Caylee on the night of the 16th does not mean she was there. Nor does it mean Lazzaro was wrong. You are saying that the entire OCSO is totally wrong? You are kidding, right?
Trust me, the state of Florida is not simple minded. They do not base a death penalty case on only cell phone pings, like you are doing. Don’t do that.
Weezie10 // August 14, 2009 at 4:44 pm
No not kidding. So you are saying that it happened the afternoon of the 16th?
Marinade Dave // August 14, 2009 at 4:52 pm
What you are stating, Weezie, goes against the date the lead investigator for OCSO told me personally. Personally.
http://marinadedave.wordpress.com/2009/07/21/i-called-the-cops/
I argued and argued and argued for months over this with someone else until I proved it. Caylee did not spend the night of the 16th at the Anthony house. She was dead. Common sense tells you that or certainly, Cindy would have remembered she had to do something with the girl before she and George left for work on the 17th. Explain that.
Weezie10 // August 14, 2009 at 4:59 pm
OK OK, sounds like I hit a nerve. I am just going over the timeline and putting my 2 cents worth into the fray. I have to go back again and look at the 16th. Maybe I will see the light.
Marinade Dave // August 14, 2009 at 5:02 pm
Yes, Weezie, and remember, you are basing YOUR case on only pings, nothing else. Don’t you think OCSO knows more about this case than pings? Besides, where did Caylee go the morning of the 17th? You need to figure that one out if you expect your theory to have any merit.
Weezie10 // August 14, 2009 at 7:57 pm
Dave: I’m sure this is where the theory of the 16th holds a lot of weight:
4:25 pm KC attempts to call CA’s cell.
4:25 pm KC cell phone pings show her tracking westward.
No activity on phone for 2 hours and 7 minutes.
[NOTE: Up until this point KC has gone no more than about 30 minutes at a time not texting or calling some one.]
5:00 pm to midnight no activity on laptop.
5:57 pm KC’s cell phone pings show her tracking northwestward.
6:31 pm KC attempts to call CA’s cell.
It doesn’t appear that KC stayed the night of the 15th. shown as such:
June 15th: 7:45 am Anthony home leaves voicemail on KC’s cell
7:45 am KC calls voicemail (Unless George and Cindy were not aware that she was at home).
Now to the 17th:
4:00-11:00 pm no activity on desktop (GA at work from 3:00 to 11:00 pm)
4:04 pm KC attempts to call TL.
4:05 pm KC attempts to call TL. KC’s cell phone pings show her at or near the Anthony home.
LE analysis of ping records show KC was at or near the Anthony home at 4:05 pm and between 4:36 pm and 5:23 pm shows KC is traveling west.
No activity on phone for 6 hours and 18 minutes.
This could mean nothing but there is a 6 hour time frame of KC not using her phone and George was at work from 3 – 11pm that day. What happened to those lost 6 hours of opportunity, and the fact that the ladder was discovered that night when Cindy got home from work?
Look I’m not saying it did happen on 17th, but she was in the area and not with TL, George and Cindy were out of the house.
I can’t explain where Caylee was on the night of the 16th. Ok she was dead then and the 17th means nothing. alright I guess I concede
Marinade Dave // August 14, 2009 at 8:12 pm
Like I said, Weezie, you are focusing on one thing and one thing only. Police departments look at the whole picture. Casey spent the night of the 15th at her parents’ home. The proof is that she accessed the desktop computer early in the morning of the 16th. There are other factors involved than just cell phone pings, but she was in the house that morning and later on Caylee was never seen again. That pinpoints the day to the 16th. You can’t explain where Caylee was that night. Well, welcome to the club. No one can explain it, either, and that goes for every night until December 11, when she was found. I must commend you for your work, though.
Weezie10 // August 14, 2009 at 8:21 pm
Dave ; I’m glad you broke the seriousness of my quest. God I need a life. Just a quickie though. How do we know it was Casey on the computer? Couldn’t it have been George or Cindy? I’m not picking really. I just don’t understand why they would call her on her cell phone if she was under their roof? She was on the phone for over an hour with TL on the 15th/16th, then she could have gone to TL’s overnight, leaving Caylee at home. She could have come home, after getting that early call from Anthony home (telling her to come get Caylee cause George had to go to work for 3).
Even so, that leaves the 16th open for the crime to have occured. I guess you would be right. I don’t know why I am stuck on 17th. I guess I already stated it. 6 hours NO PHONE.
Thanks Dave. You always bring it back home.
I guess we can agree to disagree, what the heck it’s only a murder…..hmmmm….
There’s a new murder mystery on NG. Young woman abducted, while boyfriend hears it all while talking to her on her cell phone. She was jogging while talking to him? They can’t find the cell phone or the woman. This is a mystery
Marinade Dave // August 14, 2009 at 8:30 pm
You can disagree with me, Weezie, but remember, you are also disagreeing with the State of Florida, not just me. You can think whatever you want. I’ve been through this whole mess with someone else who would not believe me or OCSO or the prosecution until I proved it. Obviously, you have skipped a lot of my posts or you would know by now, but that’s no big deal. I asked you to read what the lead detective told me. IN PERSON. That’s OK, you don’t have to believe him either, but do us both a favor, please read this post:
http://marinadedave.wordpress.com/2009/08/04/you-want-premeditation-ill-give-you-premeditation/
Then, come back and ask me any questions you want.
By the way, have you ever lost your cell phone and called it from your home number, to find it?
Weezie10 // August 15, 2009 at 3:55 pm
Dave; I read the post last night, even though I was very tired. I will reread it again, and yes you are right, I missed it entirely. Very interesting indeed. If I find any questions to it, I will ask later. Thanks.
Marinade Dave // August 15, 2009 at 4:15 pm
My pleasure, Weezie. Yes, by all means, ask any questions that arise. I am always asking, so I will always accept.
Stacey // August 16, 2009 at 2:08 pm
You should do some research on Nancy Grace, she is a victim of a crime. Her boyfriend was murdered, that is why she became a prosecutor.
Marinade Dave // August 16, 2009 at 2:34 pm
Oh boy, Stacey, we have our hands full with Casey, although I wouldn’t mind writing a post about it sometime.
Weezie10 // August 16, 2009 at 2:48 pm
If you missed Larry King on Friday, it is repeating tonight. NG was interviewed by Anderson Cooper about her new book. You get a pretty good background on her and then her kids come on. Boy they are really cute too.
I have a lot of respect for NG even though there are times I want to throw something at the screen. She can be nasty or RUDE, but that’s part of her gig. That’s what makes her show so popular. She loves to spar, even if it gets her in trouble. I sure would want her on my side if she ever decided to go back and jump to the other side as a DEFENCE ATTORNEY. But that won’t happen. She is very content. Her new book is a novel so you won’t be getting the details of what she went through on loosing her fiance. I think she wants to bury that part of her life. She remembers but is very grateful to have found a new love and of course her children.