WHY

November 10, 2009 · 83 Comments

Who, what, where, when, why and how

Since July of last year, we’ve received mountains of information addressing the murder of Caylee Marie Anthony and her mother, who is charged with the crime. Because the evidence points to one person, I think it’s safe to say that 99.7% of the people interested in this case believe, without a doubt, that Casey Marie Anthony is guilty of killing her daughter.

So far, we know who it was and we are sure we know who was responsible. We know what happened. Caylee was murdered. Do we know where the crime took place? If Casey is truly guilty, odds are it occurred inside the Anthony home. Could it have happened anywhere else? Conceivably, yes, and more about this aspect may come out prior to or during trial.

We also know a bit about when Caylee was killed. The last time anyone saw her alive was June 16, 2008. Since she was never seen again, it’s fairly reasonable to conclude that on June 16, she died. Bingo. Cut and dried.

I don’t think we’ll ever know how Caylee died. Several theories are floating around. The latest one is death by injection of homemade chloroform, but there is no precise evidence to verify it. Lots of garbage was tossed into the woods where she was found. How will the state prove it was Casey’s needle? How will prosecutors explain the testosterone found on it? In court, “maybes” won’t count and the defense is well aware of that.

As we consider who, what, where and how, have we ever really sat down to ponder why Caylee was murdered in a, seemingly, cold-blooded fashion? If you think about it, none of the media outlets have given any thought to it. None. In April, I wrote an article titled, When a mother kills. In it, I took an in-depth look at filicide, which is the deliberate act of a parent killing their own son or daughter. In real life, Motown singer/songwriter Marvin Gaye was shot to death by his father in 1984. In mythology, Hercules killed his wife and children in a fit of rage induced by the goddess Hera. The list is long and society looks the other way, never considering possible causes.

What I’d like to know is why Caylee was killed. As much as we seem to know about this horrible murder, what are some of the possible motives? If, in fact, her mother committed the crime, why did she do it? Was it jealousy? To be able to party again? Was it because deep down inside, Casey never wanted to have a child? Certainly, to wander aimlessly for a month without fully comprehending the magnitude of her daughter’s death, was something terribly askew in her mind? What sane person would think like that? Could there be underlying factors at work? Are you aware of postpartum depression? The symptoms may hide themselves as manic-depression or bipolar disorder. Bouts of euphoria, agitation, sleeplessness, sexual promiscuity, and hyperactivity are not unusual. Very easily, poor judgment could be a result. This is, in no manner, meant to soften the blow, and Casey is not claiming she suffered from any form of mental disorder, but if she killed Caylee, why did she do it? Why haven’t the media taken an in-depth look into the mind of this filicidal mother, to discern and recognize some of the possible reasons? So far, all we’ve really discussed are the whos, whats, wheres and hows. Do we have any whys?

x

PLEASE VOTE FOR ME!

mobbies

→ 83 CommentsCategories: Casey Anthony · Human Interest
Tagged: , , , ,

Please Vote for Me!

November 9, 2009 · 655 Comments

I’m rerunning this post as a reminder to please vote for me.

I hate to sound like a Chicago style politician, but please VOTE EARLY & VOTE OFTEN. The Orlando Sentinel allows you to vote once each day. As a resident of the Orlando area and a subscriber to the newspaper, I sure would appreciate your support. It would be nice to win this local award.

mobbies

RULES:

  1. Voting for the 2009 Orbbies begins Nov. 2 at 10 am and ends on Friday, Nov. 20 at 5 pm.
  2. You may vote once per category, per day. You may also vote once per day for Best Overall Blog (BOB). You must log in to your OrlandoSentinel.com account in order to vote.
  3. Winners in each category and for “best overall” will be notified by e-mail before 5 p.m. on Wednesday, Nov. 25. The winner in each category will receive an ad campaign of 20,000 impressions on OrlandoSentinel.com and a rockin’ certificate. If a blog wins in more than one category (it can win in up to three), the runner-up will receive the ad campaign. If there are not enough nominations within a category like categories may be merged or a prize may not be issued for that category.
  4. For more details about the contest, including restrictions and other limitations, check out the complete rules. Other questions? E-mail us.

If you enjoy reading my blog and the comments of everyone here, please keep me in mind. Although it’s not a life-making or breaking thing, it would be nice to have. I’ve never been much of an award type guy, but I would appreciate it if you show me that you recognize my blog as having some sort of impact in the Orlando area by bringing you a news story of great interest that spans well beyond Central Florida.

Thank you very much.

VOTE HERE

(Or click on the logo)

→ 655 CommentsCategories: Casey Anthony · Human Interest
Tagged: , , , , ,

1 dead in downtown Orlando shooting – At least 6 shot – Suspect in custody

November 6, 2009 · 13 Comments

jason rodriguez

BOLO – Jason Rodriguez – silver, 2002 Nissan SUV with tag number D11UXR

UPDATE 2:10 PM:

Vehicle found at Hollowbrook Apartments/Curry Ford Road & 436 (Semoran Blvd.)

2:19 – SUSPECT IN CUSTODY

One person was killed in a shooting at a downtown Orlando office this morning. According to Orlando Fire Department dispatch and Orlando police, at least six to eight other people were shot and transported to ORMC (Orlando Regional Medical Center.)

The two dead people were found on the eight and tenth floors of the office building. The shooting happened at 1000 Legion Place at the Gateway Center.

downtown shooting

Photo courtesy NAOMI RINGER, ORLANDO SENTINEL / November 6, 2009

WESH 2 reporter Gail Paschall-Brown, who is at the scene on the ground, said that 15 employees came out of the building very distraught. She spoke with one who said that a former employee came into the office who hadn’t worked at the company in over a year. Police have now named the suspect, but he remains at large. 40-year-old Jason Rodriguez is the man police are looking for. According to the Orange County Sheriff’s Office, he is described as a light-skinned Hispanic male wearing blue jeans and a Polo-style shirt. He is believed to be driving a silver, 2002 Nissan SUV with tag number D11UXR.

“At 11 o’clock, we received a call about shots fired at the 1000 block of Legions Place,” Sgt. Barb Jones said early this afternoon. “We deployed our active shooter teams.”

Rodriguez may have been a former employee of Reynolds, Smith & Hill, a transportation consulting firm. Police and Ken Jacobson, a spokesman for the company in its Jacksonville, Florida headquarters, confirmed the shooting took place in the consulting firm’s office. “We understand the shootings did take place in our office,” Jacobson said. “People were shot in our offices.”

Apparently, Jason Rodriguez drove to his mother’s apartment. When she watched the story unfold on TV, she quietly called 911 to report that her son was there. SWAT personnel rammed his vehicle and entered the apartment, where he was taken into custody very quietly and very successfully.

PLEASE VOTE FOR ME!

mobbies

→ 13 CommentsCategories: Casey Anthony · Human Interest
Tagged: , , , , , ,

New material released today

November 6, 2009 · 616 Comments

More than 2,100 pages of documents were released this morning by the State Attorney’s Office in the case against Casey Anthony. Among the pages are evidence lists, a handful of photos, and e-mails between OCSO detectives and FBI personnel.

Syringe in bottle found near remains contained traces of chloroform

FBI lab technicians found an unknown liquid and chloroform inside a Cool-Blue Gatorade bottle. The bottle also contained a plastic bag labeled “Disposable Syringe Kit” with a needle inside. Traces of chloroform were detected inside the syringe.

syringe

PDF: Anthony Documents, Nov. 6, Photographs
PDF: Anthony Documents, Nov. 6, FBI Test
PDF: Anthony Documents, Nov. 6, DNA Tests
PDF: Anthony Documents, Set 13 (Nov. 6) Knife
PDF: Anthony Documents Nov. 6 Insects, Tires

summary of conclusions

june 19-22

knife

doll

Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5
Part 6
Part 7
Part 8
Part 9
Part 10
Part 11
Part 12
Part 13
Part 14
Part 15
Part 16
Part 17
Part 18
Part 19
Part 20
Part 21
Part 22
Part 23
Part 24
Part 25
Part 26
Part 27
Part 28
Part 29
Part 30
Part 31
Part 32
Part 33
Part 34

Please check back. I will be updating this post as new material becomes available.

PLEASE VOTE FOR ME!

mobbies

→ 616 CommentsCategories: Casey Anthony · Human Interest
Tagged: , , , ,

A few runs, several hits, and a couple of errors

November 2, 2009 · 190 Comments

The MLB (Major League Baseball) World Series is now underway, pitting the Philadelphia Phillies of the National League against the New York Yankees of the American League. It has been a time-honored tradition since 1903. That’s 101 years longer than I’ve been writing this blog, including my other one at Blogger. Along this path, I’ve learned a lot about people and the Internet. I’ve hit a few home runs where I’ve exposed a number of inconsistencies related to the people and stories about the Casey Anthony case. I’ve also made a number of good, solid, base hits. And like an umpire, I’ve tried to remain as neutral as possible. That has helped increase readership because I really do try to be fair to everyone. I don’t allow name calling or bashing. Sometimes, I have strayed out of the ball park of my own rules and some of those hits have been foul balls. Two, in particular, were errors. Before I go into that, let me explain a little more about myself and throw in a few other thoughts.

I used to make a marinade, hence the Marinade Dave moniker that’s stuck with me throughout the years. It was my own recipe and I sold it in many markets around Orlando. When I decided to blog, I figured I could dedicate it to marinades, marinating, recipes and all food in general. Sure, it started out that way, but it didn’t take long before I chose to expand my horizons by including matters of politics, religion and, of course, a little humor along the way. My choice to diversify was my own to make because no one owns the Internet. No one tells us what we can and cannot write about. Since those days of November, 2004, we’ve all come a long way, too. Six years ago, we never knew that words like YouTube and Twitter would work their way into everyday language, like Google had done before. Today, you Google something, no matter what search engine you use. Today, everyone knows what a blog is. Are tweets far behind?

Back in the early days of blogging, WordPress was an exclusive club. You couldn’t just open one like you can today. It was by invitation only and it stood above the rest. It still does. The person who invited me is a published author. He liked my writing style. We separated a couple of years ago or so over differences of opinion. An avowed socialist, he wanted to be the supreme commandeer of the Internet. I could never fathom, nor could I understand his outlandish notions that everyone on the Internet, you, me, and your little dog, had to be licensed to contribute anything at all. Not just that, but you had to use your real name. No nicknames. His law was written on a post titled, Why Do You Hide Your Identity? He also made a complete mockery of faith and religion. Consequently, he lost almost all of his readers and became recognized as an Internet basket case; the fanatic. Gone were the glory days. My job isn’t to pick on him or anyone else, but I must say all of us have been guilty of trying to force our views on others to some degree, especially on blogs and forums. In the real world of social sites, aside from child porn and very little more, there are no rules that guide us and there shouldn’t be. It’s stupid to think there could be one giant czar who would run the entire network of Web sites around the world, because each and every country has its own set of rules and values and the Internet is international. I would hope that common courtesy is recognized the world over, too, but that’s not true. Despite being such a huge cultural market, where people of all persuasions meld, rudeness is rudeness the world over. Only fools try to use their foreign customs as an excuse. Believe me, I know that first hand.

What we do on the Internet is hide behind the facade of anonymity. We live miles and miles apart from each other, sometimes oceans away. That seems to give some license to write whatever they want. George is Caylee’s father, I’ve heard before, but would the accusers ever scream that standing two feet away from him? Would people really spit in Cindy’s face because they feel she is just as guilty as Casey? It seems, the longer this case goes on, the nastier it becomes and the less we know each other, the more we are willing to throw barbs at each other, too. It has gotten downright nasty and little things turn into veritable wars. How sad.

One of the obstacles of writing comments is the personal void left because we can’t add real affection and innuendo to words. To write ‘I like you’ in a sentence is different from saying it while shaking one’s hand. To complain about something is mostly the same way. Something is lost in translation and it takes on a very personal tone. When a former commenter made claims about our stupidity over the Anthony case, it was, invariably, taken the wrong way for several reasons. One, this person, who speaks a different language, couldn’t understand English like we do and didn’t realize how words can hurt – or else she did so on purpose and used the language barrier as her excuse. What this person really failed to grasp was that words are like arrows and they cut deeply into the hearts of people. What was taken advantage of was the kindness of the host, in this case, me. Some people have never met a person they can’t insult and they will never change. It’s a very bitter existence.

Because of the delicate balance of what I call the “I” and “me” online persona, we remain relatively hardened and aloof to all outsiders, too. The easiest way to describe “I” and “me” is this way: “I” am what I am in the company of people who are not all that close to me. I might belch amongst my friends, but would I do it in church or in the theatre? Certainly, on a first date, neither person would make embarrassing bodily noises they might have no problem with later on, as they become more comfortable with each other. That’s when the “me” person takes over. The more relaxed we are, the more open we become. That’s happened here on the blog. The more we communicate, the more we open up. There may still be an element of stark separation, but it loses its coldness. It’s a shame that some people won’t relax and settle in, like at a campfire on the beach, listening to the roar of the calming surf.

Last night was very unsettling. A big fight broke out and I wrote an analogy of sorts in one of the comments. It went like this:

Years ago, I was in the restaurant business. I hired mostly high school and college age kids. I tried to be fair to each and every one of them, but of course, there were exceptions. Bear with me because what I’m going to say should make sense in the end.

In a retail establishment, certainly a restaurant, there is a front of house and a back of house. I never chopped onions in front of a customer, nor did I allow any of my employees to argue out front because it would alienate customers. Who wants to eat at a restaurant where people are fighting? They’re probably not paying attention to anything else, like the quality of the food. Do they wash their hands after they use the bathroom? No one likes a mess. No one.

Let’s say, for the sake of argument… no, I’m not asking for one… I have 20 employees and they all split hours. I’ll tell you right from the start, in no time at all, I’ll know who I can rely on in a pinch and I’ll know the ones I can’t, but the funny thing is, that’s not exactly what I mean. Let’s look at life and schedules. Some of those employees have other commitments; family, boyfriends/girlfriends, school, church, homework. Others have less. Some of them love to work and get their hands dirty. They are more interested in working for reasons unknown. Maybe, they like it because they get to work with me. Doubtful. Maybe, it’s because they like to work with their friends. It doesn’t matter, and no one becomes the boss’s pet. What happens is that everyone fits into their own schedule. They work according to their own needs. Some want 30 hours a week. Some want 10. Why would a kid working 10 hours a week gripe about the one working 30 when they are responsible for working the hours they asked for? As I said, no one is a favorite, but the one with the most hours is going to have the most experience and when Davey Boy needs time off, who do you think the extra hours should go to? Why gripe to that person? Why not come to me and only me and ask why I have a better working relationship with others?

One of the reasons why I had virtually no turnover of employees was because I tried to make their time at work a good experience. I tried to teach them morals and responsibilities. Throughout the days and years spent with me, I did my best to make that time fun. Sure, things got out of hand once in a while and I had to crack the whip. I asked them how they’d feel if I take a few hours off their schedule next week. Trust me, I’ve got a thousand kids banging on my back door, begging for a job. They didn’t like that, but that was then and they were employees. I paid them, but the similarities to those days are so eerie today. Sometimes, I feel like I’m working with youngsters again, not adults. Of course, this isn’t a job, but I’ve tried to mix fun in with serious investigative work. Just like in the days of the restaurant business, on the Internet, there are times to be serious and there are lots of times to have fun. We are working on a complex murder case. We get to meet hundreds of people with individual personalities. Because of the very nature of the crime, we need to unwind once in a while and let our guard down. It’s human nature. Believe me, I understand why some of us will never be friends, but can’t we get along fine, just the same?

Initially, it’s a lot more complex to bond on the Internet and because of online threats and just plain, old fashioned common sense, we remain on guard. Person-to-person meetings reduce caution and tension a lot more than conference calls and certainly, even more so here, since our only means of communication is typing, where words are taken out of context all the time. Because we can’t add that dimension of real-time, live affection and emotion, sentences become weapons when in most cases, they weren’t meant that way at all. I make it a point to never ask anyone a forward question, like for their e-mail address. For one thing, I hate the fear of rejection, but more importantly, it places the other person in an awkward position. It backs them into a corner and no one comes out a winner. No one, because in a matter of seconds, an Internet acquaintance, one that may have eventually blossomed into a friend, immediately goes on the defense and sometimes, both people fade into the sunset of commenting. It sours them. The thought of that happening on account of my blog, in particular, greatly depresses me. I don’t want people to be so personally involved in any site that they take words to heart.

Do I have room to talk?

I’ll be the first one to admit I’ve made mistakes online and I’m sure there are more to go. I’m far from perfect, and now to the heart of the matter; the baseball connection. In this World Series of Blogging, and it has never-ending innings, I’ve made a couple of errors. The most recent one was the article titled, My views on the cruise, clues and recent news. I dropped the ball on that one.

On June 2 of this year, I published a post titled, From the Vomiteria. Don’t go looking for it. I took it down. In it, I admonished several of Hal Boedeker’s¹ commenters for writing scathing reviews of Andrea Lyon based on her looks instead of her credentials. Actually, I quoted two columns². I ended up ridiculing those people for ridiculing her. Were they wrong? Yes, but so was I and for more reasons than one. I wasn’t really concerned about plagiarizing anyone by lifting those unflattering comments and placing snippets of them into my post. To plagiarize is to “to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one’s own: to use (another’s production) without crediting the source.³“ I wasn’t guilty of that. I linked the sources and provided the names of the people who wrote them. Only, I was wrong. Two lines separate comments and those who write them on Boedeker’s online Orlando Sentinel column. There is a thin line directly above the name of the individual and a thin line directly below the body copy of the comment. I sandwiched the name and comment between the two lines together. Wrong. The first line separates the comment from the name of the writer, just below. All of the comments I claimed were written by folks like Rose and Sally were actually written by someone else. They recently brought the mistake to my attention and I promised I would make it right by apologizing. As a matter of fact, to show how fair & balanced I really am, compared to some who will never refrain from picking fights with others, I apologize to everyone there, including Hal Boedeker. I like to think I’m a more sensitive and sensible writer than I was then, that I’ve grown, and that I would be nothing more than a liar and a hypocrite if I didn’t own up to my mistakes. Whoever I’ve offended in the past, I apologize. I do have a feisty side, but I shouldn’t point the finger. As a matter of fact, no one should, and that leads us back to our constant and underlying problem with infighting. Can’t we just all get along? The trial is nearly a year away and I would like us to focus on the crime more than on how we can’t stand each other. No one said we had to be the best of friends, but I sure would like to run a happy blog. I’d like to be around to continue covering this case, too, from my unique perspective, but I’m getting tired. The bickering and backstabbing is getting old. We are adults.

If you have a situation, all I ask is that you bring it to my attention. That is the proper Internet protocol. If you want to get closer to another commenter, the only real way to make a connection is through private channels. If you want to complain about someone, it’s the same thing. You send me an e-mail and leave that person alone. Since I host this blog, I am the go between. It is safe, discreet and it is what we commonly refer to as netiquette. Everything that’s ever said to me is kept in the strictest of confidence and I think, by now, you know you can trust me. Believe me, I am not just here to write. I am here to listen and everyone has a voice. If you feel a fight coming on, take it to the brand new Fighting Page. It’s right at the top of the blog, up there with Blog Rules. I wrote them for a reason.


→ 190 CommentsCategories: Casey Anthony · Human Interest
Tagged: , , , , , , , ,

A Halloween Story

October 31, 2009 · 82 Comments

I had something else I wanted to post today, but I’ll do it tomorrow or Monday. In the meantime, this is a story I first wrote in 2006. Because it’s Halloween, I’m republishing it – with several modifications. Please don’t be frightened.

The Night I Screamed On Halloween


A few years ago, I told my mother about the scariest Halloween moment in my life. She questioned whether she would have let me venture out on my own at the tender age of 6. I was with a friend from the neighborhood and we were in the same class at school, so I wasn’t really alone. I told her, sure, why not? Times were different then. We left our windows open at night. During hot summer months, most houses were without air conditioning and the only thing that separated us from the rest of the world was a screen door. Crime wasn’t something that was ever present in our minds. It was a different time…

It was a chilly autumn night, so, so many years ago. It was my first foray out with a friend on Halloween. No moms allowed! I was a man this night, or so I thought. Harold and I went out to make the rounds just as darkness fell. There were lots of kids in all sorts of costumes milling about, stopping at most of the homes in the close knit community. Some were decorated and they seemed like the most inviting – the ones that would give out the best candy! I remember the flickering of candlelit pumpkins with each eerie twist and turn throughout the neighborhood. Skeletons hung from trees and porches, swaying in the gentle breeze. We talked of ghosts and goblins and tried to stay away from dark alleys and back yards. No way! Oh yeah, and houses with their lights off, too, because that meant they were going to grab us and take us to the basement where we’d never be seen again. Maybe, it really just meant they weren’t home, but we weren’t going to take any chances.

I had a big brown paper shopping bag to stuff all that tooth rotting goodness in. There were no paper or plastic options at the grocery store back then. These were the days of old when the milkman left glass bottles at our doorsteps and on freezing winter morns, the cream would expand and push the cardboard cap up and out a few inches. Brrr. Rabbit ears were the best way to watch our round screen black & white TVs.

Harold wanted to finish the night at his house. “OK,” I said, “we started at mine, we can stop at yours.”

I had never been to his place before. He lived about 6 or 7 houses up and on the other side of the street. When you’re six years old, that’s pretty far away and I wasn’t too crazy about being almost out of sight of my own place. We must have visited all kinds of critters, I mean people, while working our way to his house. I was slowly approaching unmarked territory. At night, too. In the dark. Halloween night! I was getting nervous. OK, this is far enough.

“I think it’s getting late. I’m getting tired,” I said. We’d been out long enough and had plenty of goodies to last a long time. We probably had bewitching hours, anyway. It was probably a school night.

“OK. Let’s go to my place,” Harold said.

“I’m ready!” Besides, I was getting bored.

Everywhere I went, everyone made me take off my mask. “Oh, you’re Sam & Dottie’s boy.”

When we got to his house, we walked up the sidewalk and scaled the stairs to his front porch. The porch light was off and it was downright spooky. I sensed evil lurking about. We knocked and suddenly the door opened.

“TRICK OR TREAT!” We screamed in unison.

“I want to see a trick!” his father quickly replied. A trick? I didn’t know what he was talking about. Saying trick or treat meant I was going to get candy. That’s all. What was this trick thing all about?

“When you say trick or treat, I can ask you to do a trick first. Then I give you a treat. Do you have a trick?”

Harold and I gave each other a puzzled look and said, “Huh? Nooooo?!”

“Well, then, I have a trick for you,” and just like that, his top teeth popped out and back into his mouth in an instant. I froze dead in my tracks and just stared up at him. Then he did it again. Those teeth popped out of his face and dangled for a second and then zipped right back inside his mouth.

I let out a blood curdling scream that woke the dead at the cemetery down the street. Today, neighbors would call 911 after hearing the panic in my voice. I turned to run, when all of a sudden, Harold’s mom suddenly appeared from behind his father and quickly came out the door to comfort me. Whatever his name was, she sure did scold him. Then, she turned to me…

“He shouldn’t have done that.” The guy was rolling on the floor with laughter. Harold didn’t know what to do. “Sometimes when people’s teeth go bad, the dentist has to pull them out. Then, he gives you new ones to chew your food and have a nice smile. They come out and you put them back in. They’re not real. Lots of people have them,” She turned to him. “Apologize right now!”

I don’t remember if he said anything or not. He was still laughing. I was pretty rattled and couldn’t stop shaking in my boots. She said she would walk me home. I was not about ready to venture out of that neighborhood by myself. When we got back to my place, she explained to my mother what a horror filled trauma I had just gone through. I sensed a snicker or two and I’m not talking about the candy variety.

“Mom? Can I sleep with the light on tonight?” I asked. “I’m never going back to that house again,” and I never did. “Mom, would you lock the front door, just in case?” For the longest time, I wouldn’t even look at that place and I sure was glad when we moved.

I never saw Harold’s dad again. We never discussed it in school, either. When I was old enough to understand, I wondered how the father of a six year old boy could have lost his teeth so young.

Maybe, he ate too much Halloween candy.


→ 82 CommentsCategories: Casey Anthony · Human Interest
Tagged: , , ,

Hobbies: killing people, cutting

October 29, 2009 · 186 Comments

Or so it says on OkamiKage’s YouTube Channel

Last signed in: 1 year ago

Commentary

I learned how to use a gun when I was a child. One time, my father took me out squirrel hunting. I was the spotter. Look, I said, as I pointed up a tree. My father took aim and squeezed the trigger. Pow, just like that, the squirrel fell off its perch and down to the ground. I walked over to it. It was writhing in pain and I watched intently until it took its final breath. That experience really impacted me tremendously. I couldn’t have been more than 10 years old, if that, but I never wanted to see an animal die again. Because of my reaction, my father never hunted again, either. To this day, I have never owned a gun or weapon of any kind and I never will. I don’t mind skeet shooting or target practice, but I have no desire to watch anything die by the hands of another.

Even at that age, I knew the difference between life and death. I still can’t figure out why I am not a vegetarian.

x

→ 186 CommentsCategories: Casey Anthony · Human Interest
Tagged: , , , , , ,

Elizabeth Olten’s killer identified

October 29, 2009 · 393 Comments

“If I had a child, I would want the community to be there to support me.”

People of all ages came out to honor the memory of 9-year-old Elizabeth Olten of St. Martins, Missouri, on Wednesday afternoon. If they didn’t attend the service at Concord Baptist Church, they stood along Horner Road near the entrance to Hawthorne Memorial Gardens, where she was laid to rest.

Meanwhile, an as yet unidentified 15-year-old neighbor girl sits in jail, charged with her murder. Her attorney, Kurt Valentine, said Elizabeth’s death has put Jefferson City in turmoil. “In the local high school, friends of both sides have been getting into arguments and had fights over this case,” he said. Quite clearly, a lot of people seem to know the girl’s identity.

She was arrested last Friday after leading authorities to Elizabeth’s body, police said. Hundreds of people had searched the area last week after she disappeared. The Cole County Sheriff’s Department said she was well concealed in heavy woods and foliage.

On Tuesday, I received an e-mail that proffered information and a trail for me to follow. As an inquisitive sort of guy, I did just that. What I found was the name of the girl who now sits behind bars and a photograph of her from an Internet social site called SingSnap that bills itself as “the biggest, baddest and best singing community in the world.”

If you Google SingSnap, it says that it’s “a free online karaoke community where you can sing and record from a large variety of karaoke songs and comment on other karaoke enthusiast’s” material.

Of course, that led me to her profile by searching for her screen name. She has been a SingSnap member since October 22 of 2007 and she’s made a total of 8 recordings. The profile includes her name.

This placed me in a perplexing situation. Should I reveal her name or not? In a unanimous 1979 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the First Amendment protects the rights of journalists to use the names of minors in stories deemed newsworthy as long as the information is lawfully obtained and reported truthfully. In the case of Smith v. Daily Mail, the court struck down a West Virginia law that had been previously used to prosecute two newspapers from the state that printed the name of a 14-year old junior high school student who allegedly shot and killed a 15-year old classmate.

OK, I guess that protects me – sort of – but I just received an e-mail from a concerned reader who cautioned, “Nancy Grace has her picture and her name also and she stated she is not allowed to disclose any of it by law until she goes to court and is deemed to stand trail as an ADULT. You can be in some serious trouble over this, why would you want to put yourself in that situation for a ’story’ on a blog?”

Because of these mixed signals, I was not going to reveal her name, but news is now leaking, so I will compromise. I will give you her SnipSnap screen name, along with other social sites she belongs to. Here, I’ll tell you her first name is Alyssa. If you are interested, look for yourself.

A month ago, Alyssa wrote a tweet on her Twitter account. A tweet is a post or status update on the microblogging service. She goes by the name alyssadailene. This was the entry dated September 28: “this is all i want in life; a reason for all this pain.”

On September 9, she wrote, “encompass’d with a thousand dangers; weary, faint, tremblinng with a thousand terrors; i in a fleshly tomb, am buried above grounnd. – william cowper”

She also has private Facebook and Myspace accounts. On Facebook, her name is, well, her real name. On Myspace, she goes by alyssaheartsyou<3.

Several bits and pieces of information, whether factual or not, have surfaced online and in rumor mills. In one text, an alleged friend wrote, “She told my friend that she wanted to commit a murder to see if she could get away with it” and, “She told this to many kids at her school”.

The messages continued…

it was her sisters best friend

she killed her little sisters best friend

Word also leaked that she had not only planned it, she dug the grave the week before. All names have been removed.

can you see this

im here saddened ..

ok

yes I can see the chat, but not NG

I have this information only cus I have actually talked to the murderer online sitting at my ex gfs house

shes on Singsnap as Wolf_Heart

there is a picture of her there too

She planned the murder

my friend Jennifer told me all of it this afternoon

she lives there

her boyfriend helped her bury the body

she told someone she did it for fun

shes a monster

no not really

parents are ?

Allysas mom is a drug abuser

She lives with her grandmother

She should get the chair

that grandmother must be beyond herself with emotions too

imagine her little sister

oh absolutely

it was Allysas little sisters best friend

that grandmother must be beyond herself with emotions too

imagine her little sister

oh absolutely

it was Allysas little sisters best friend

It was a murder plain and simple

she killed her to see if she could get away with it

I’ve sent you a private message.

Oh BS….. 15 yr olds know right from wrong !!!…..they can’t get away with saying a 15 yr old is not compitent to stand trial !!

she slit the girls neck and wrists according to my source

When I called the Cole County Sheriff’s Department yesterday, I was told that the deputy in charge is Colin Murdick. He was in a meeting and chose not to talk to me. Instead, I was instructed to e-mail him the information I had received, which I did, minus the sender’s address. I wrote a nice letter explaining to him that I, in no way, wanted to hinder the investigation by revealing anything still left unpublished. Here was his entire response:

No comment

Rather terse. Anyway, please feel free to look around for more information. In the meantime, this is a picture of the alleged suspect from SingSnap. I covered her eyes. Remember, whoever committed this heinous crime has not been officially named yet. The girl behind bars will remain there until November 18, when a judge will decide whether to charge her as an adult or not. Until then, she is still a minor and only a suspect.

Alyssa Bustamante_NoID


Judge opens adult certification hearing to public

x

→ 393 CommentsCategories: Casey Anthony
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

They could never ask for a better judge

October 27, 2009 · 237 Comments

For anyone who thinks I am buttering up to the judge, guess again. We’ve already met and I doubt if we will do so again, unless I have an opportunity to attend part of the murder trial next year. Even so, I will be there as an observer and I seriously doubt he would hold me in contempt for anything or need to reintroduce himself.

judge-stan-stricklandPhoto courtesy of Orlando Sentinel

After my experience in the courtroom at Casey’s last hearing, I read several comments elsewhere that questioned Circuit Court Judge Stan Strickland’s wisdom because he acknowledged reading my blog. I’m sure he reads many others, including forums. He may have recognized me because my face is plastered at the top, in the banner. Easily, he could have told me I look better in my picture than I do in real life and I’m sure he would be right, but I firmly believe he is fair and extremely discreet, and I’m convinced he wouldn’t agree with what a lot of people continue to say about the entire case. Yes, at times that would include me, I’m sure. I wonder what he thinks about breaking news reports of signed book contracts that prove later to be unfounded? Does he pay close attention to the frenzy of the screaming crowds and how they may fuel the defense motions for changes of venue?

It saddens me to read any negative comments about him anywhere, because he can’t just stick his head in the ground until this case is over. He shouldn’t stop reading the Orlando Sentinel or watching the nightly news. He can’t just sequester himself and close his eyes and ears. Please give him the benefit of the doubt. After all, he didn’t achieve this stature by basing guilt or innocence on nothing more than other people’s opinions. In many cases, very skewed opinions. That’s why he’s the real judge and we are not. I do not believe for one second that by perusing Web sites pertaining to this case, it would have any bearing on him regarding how he renders a decision. If anything, it would enlighten him to the madness of it all.

Upon watching him in the courtroom, I found his candor to be quite refreshing and I welcomed his open-mindedness. I saw live how sharp and focused he remains at all times. He is very well-mannered, well-informed, highly intelligent and because of his personality, humble to boot. Later, when I returned from the courthouse and read around the Internet, I found it rather peculiar that some would judge the judge and deem his qualities questionable at all for requesting to meet me, as if he must recuse himself from this case for keeping up with current affairs, including blogs and forums about all of the Anthonys and Casey’s defense lawyers.

I wonder what makes those who scrutinize Judge Strickland qualified to make broad assumptions about his reasoning and character. Why have some moved on from judging Casey to judging the judge? My, my, what narcissists some can be.

Recently, I was discussing this case with an attorney I know. I wrote about it in a comment on a post written prior to attending court, but it’s well worth repeating today. I asked her (the attorney) why, since Judge Strickland was moved from criminal to civil court in early 2009, was he hearing this criminal case? I knew then that judges are routinely moved from court to court to court and it has nothing to do with any issues pertaining to reputation or anything, unless it’s obvious. She told me that judges can take cases with them when they are moved elsewhere. She emphasized that Judge Strickland is an incredible judge and he is highly regarded, well liked and well-respected by his peers, which includes not only judges but all practicing attorneys in this entire area we call Central Florida. She added that his reasoning for taking this case with him had nothing to do with ego. Quite the contrary. It was all about not wanting to burden any other judge with this ever-expanding mess. He wouldn’t wish this on anyone.

What she told me spoke volumes about the man, his integrity, and his fairness. In the end, whatever he reads, sees and hears about this case – the stories and theories that plague the news and Internet on a daily basis – he completely understands how to judge it all, and the bottom line comes down to two things and two things only: Justice for Caylee – and no matter what anyone else thinks – Justice for Casey.

See also: Ninth Circuit Court

In August of 2008, the Central Florida Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers published its annual Judicial Poll findings. In the Public Comments of Ninth Judicial Circuit Court Judges in Orange County, here are some of the results of what criminal defense lawyers had to say about Circuit Court Judge Stan Strickland:

• Hard working, knowledgeable, superb judicial demeanor – the epitome of how a judge should act!

• Smart, pleasant, efficient. Judge who definitely knows the law although he does not necessarily always follow it.

• Judge Strickland is a fine judge with a good temperament.

• No matter which side he rules in favor of, he always seems to make the correct, legal and wise decision.

Thank you, Maura

x

→ 237 CommentsCategories: Casey Anthony · Human Interest
Tagged: , , , , , , , ,

Has law enforcement seized the “zenaida” Myspace page?

October 25, 2009 · 502 Comments

By JWG

Readers of Dave’s blog will recall his August 4 post on the “zenaida” Myspace page. Since it’s discovery early this year, that simple web page has drawn interest from many of those who follow the Caylee Anthony case because it seems to scream premeditation with its connections to Casey Anthony. To recap the features of interest:

  • The sign-up date, which can be found on the View All Blog Entries link, is June 16, 2008. This is the date Caylee was last seen alive.
  • The last login date, which can be found on the main page, is October 14, 2008. This is the date Casey was indicted for murder and jailed. It is the last possible date she could have used a computer.
  • Zenaida’s profile picture is that of “Dora the Explorer” – the iconic image also found on Caylee’s abandoned backpack.

Could it be a hoax?

Now, none of the above proves this Myspace page is connected to Casey Anthony. In fact, many have wondered if someone set up the page as a hoax. I spent some time this spring trying to find ways to “spoof” the sign-up date and last login date, and I was indeed successful in making the last login date of my own Myspace page appear to be October 14, 2008. For fun, I also spoofed the age, sex, and location fields, making me appear to be a 24-year old female from Miami.

The “hack” was pretty simple. Anyone using Myspace profile version 1.0 can click on the Edit Profile button and add some simple HTML code to the Headline section. I won’t list that code here because it really is not important. This particular hack was not used on the zenaida Myspace. How do I know? When a hack is used, it shows up in the HTML code for the web page. Not only that, the real last login date also shows up in the HTML code. Looking at the HTML code for the zenaida page I saw only the October 14 date and no hack. I was never successful in finding a way to spoof the sign-up date.

Casey Anthony seems to have had an interest in Myspace hacks. Remember those infamous searches on Google for chloroform recipes? Earlier that month – March 6 to be exact – someone on the Anthony desktop computer searched for ways to hide their Myspace page and blog. I will give you three guesses as to who performed the search, but two of them don’t count.

URL records

So while it seems Casey searched for Myspace hacks, it does not appear from my own research that the dates can be completely faked.

The Myspace user number

A couple of weeks after Dave wrote about the zenaida page, the person who originally discovered it – Valhall – had an epiphany. Myspace assigns ID numbers sequentially. There is no choice in the matter. If you go out and sign up for Myspace today, you will be assigned the next available number.

So Valhall checked Myspace ID’s on either side of the 389838213 ID assigned to zenaida. Sure enough, those Myspace members signed up on June 16, 2008. In fact, the 100 thousand or so IDs on either side of 389838213 all show a sign-up date of June 16, 2008. There can be no doubt when this page was created.

An update to the zenaida page

When Valhall first discovered the page she sent an email to OCSO describing her find. It is unclear whether or not they acted on it then. She certainly was not expecting a response, but to date nothing has popped up in discovery indicating the IP logs were subpoenaed from Myspace. It is very possible that information just has not bubbled to the surface yet. It is also possible, given the many, many “helpful tips” they receive on the high-profile case, OCSO had not prioritized it. Certainly my first reaction when I saw the page was “it is an obvious, poorly done fake.”

Information regarding the latest discovery was also forwarded on to OCSO. If they had not looked at the page back in February, maybe it was time to look at it now. The notion that the page is a fake was evaporating rapidly.

And now it seems that may be what happened, because the page was quietly updated in the past week. We have Valhall to thank for noticing.

Recall that Dave posted a comment on “zenaida’s” video channel. Here is a screenshot of what he posted:

zenaida myspace1

What link did Dave use to make that comment? He just clicked on the Videos link found on the main page:

zenaida myspace2

This past week, however, that Videos link was removed from the Myspace page. The last login date still shows as October 14, 2008 (not faked.)

zenaida myspace3

I know that the link existed at the beginning of the week because I looked at the video comments. I still had the visit in my browser history, so I clicked on the link to see if the comments were simply hidden. This is what I got:

zenaida myspace4

It seems someone other than the owner has taken control of this Myspace account.

JWG grew up in Indiana and Michigan, but moved to the northeast US after graduating from college in the early 1980’s. He has a degree in electrical engineering and has spent his entire career in the computer systems industry. His many hobbies focus mainly on sports and outdoor activities, but he does have a fondness for word and number puzzles.

He was attracted to the Anthony case because the large release of discovery has afforded him the opportunity to think like an investigator in solving a complex puzzle. It has also allowed him to learn new and interesting things he otherwise would never consider, such as cell tower operations, the chemistry of human decomposition, and the manufacture of duct tape.


→ 502 CommentsCategories: Casey Anthony · Human Interest
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Orlando Sentinel poll: Given the national media coverage, can Casey Anthony get a fair trial?

October 23, 2009 · 160 Comments

As I have highlighted in the past, the Orlando Sentinel has a weekly poll that asks questions pertinent to current affairs. I only write about those that pertain to the Casey Anthony case. The questions are posed every Friday and the results are published in the following Friday’s edition, in print and online.

Here are last week’s questions and the results. I will only include the opinions from the Anthony poll. Remember that anyone from anywhere may respond.

Will Congress pass an unacceptable health-care-reform by year’s end?

YES: 38.1%

NO: 61.9%

Should children who commit heinous crimes be tried as adults?

YES: 73.1%

NO: 26.9%

Given the national media coverage, can Casey Anthony get a fair trial?

YES: 55.1%

NO:  44.9%

Here are some of the opinions from readers:

Jurors take their duties seriously

Casey Anthony can get a fair trial. My past experience as a litigation attorney has shown me that jurors take their civic duty very seriously, and consider the evidence presented in the courtroom very carefully before reaching a verdict.

More importantly, why does the Orlando Sentinel continue to give space to Casey Anthony and the rest of her dysfunctional family? Nobody cares about these people anymore, and I’m getting tired of the media beating a dead horse month after month. It’s time for the vultures to pick a new carcass to fly over, and let the chips fall where they may at Casey’s trial.

Joy Stricker Longwood

The court of public opinion

Maybe down in Immokalee … but not locally. I have never witnessed an untried criminal case where so much of the case evidence has been released to the media for [public] scrutiny.

Support her or condemn her, Casey Anthony just [marked] her first year behind bars on nothing more than a very weak case by the prosecution and, in my opinion, a rather poor legal-defense counsel. This case is being tried in the open court of public opinion. …

nailman (from the Web)

Media want ratings and advertisers

If she can’t, all the media can do is blame themselves. In their quest for ratings and sales, they have swarmed the Anthony case like flies on a fresh cow patty. Given the media’s recent history, I have to wonder if they even bothered to check the facts of the stories they have reported on the case before broadcasting and printing them.

Sadly, the people most likely to give Casey Anthony a fair trial would never be in a jury pool. They can provide good enough reasons or excuses to get out of jury duty.

mikep-ovi (from the Web)

Did Caylee get a fair trial?

I don’t look at this sordid case through the eyes of a liberal lawyer, fretting and losing sleep over whether Casey Anthony can get a fair trial. I instead ask: “Did little Caylee Anthony get a fair trial?”

[We] become increasingly sick at our stomachs when we continue to read stories fretting and fussing over the rights of the perpetrators and [there is] no mention at all of how their victims must have lived their final hours. …

mycatchoco (from the Web)

x

→ 160 CommentsCategories: Casey Anthony · Human Interest
Tagged: , , , ,

George & Cindy offered $25,000

October 23, 2009 · 133 Comments

According to the Orlando Sentinel, a syndicated radio shock jock recently offered Casey Anthony’s parents a $25,000 payment to appear on his show for an hour.

Bubba the Love Sponge, whose show broadcasts live in several cities, including Orlando, offered the money to George and Cindy on the air on his show earlier this week.

The Anthony’s attorney, Brad Conway,  said the radio personality has not contacted him. He became aware of the offer after being contacted by the Orlando Sentinel.

“My clients are not selling interviews to people,” Conway said.

x

→ 133 CommentsCategories: Casey Anthony · Human Interest
Tagged: , , , , , , ,

Elizabeth Olten from Cole County, Missouri

October 22, 2009 · 24 Comments

Update: Elizabeth Olten body found

Mixologist74 brought this to my attention. Please go to her site and read her post about Elizabeth Olten.

There is an update to this story, unfortunately, with a bad outcome. They found her body today.

http://www.connectmidmissouri.com/news/story.aspx?id=366189


Elizabeth Olten1

Elizabeth Olten2


→ 24 CommentsCategories: Human Interest
Tagged: ,

My views on the cruise, clues and recent news

October 22, 2009 · 242 Comments

This is an opinion piece. I wrote it fully expecting a broad spectrum of opinions from every possible direction. I want to know how you feel, whether you agree with me or not. Since this is an opinion piece, you are free to call me a nut.

Since the disappearance of Caylee Marie Anthony took to the airwaves and print media last July, people have complained about the entire family. In some cases, it’s been for good reasons, but in others, people don’t seem to have a clue. We sometimes get lost in this sea of news we simply call the case against Casey.

I recently got a flurry of e-mails complaining about the cruise the Anthonys went on this past weekend. How dare them spend money from CBS. Blood money off their dead granddaughter. Look, I don’t know who paid for the 2-day cruise and to be honest, I don’t care. It could have been donated by the cruise line and you know something? We’ll never know because it’s none of our business. How come no one cares about how much money CBS made from airing that show? Why care about things that don’t concern us because we don’t understand media and the Madison Avenue giants that study how many green beans we eat in a year? It’s much too complex to sort through. A family in trouble is much easier sink our fangs into.

What has puzzled me from the start is the billions of dollars the media are making off this crime, yet no one complains. The media continue to get rich and the Anthonys must stay home, penniless. A picture surfaces on a rag mag, the Globe, with Casey holding Caylee in her now familiar blouse and the first reaction is that Casey sold it through Baez as a cryptic clue. It turns out that the odds on favorite was Ricardo Morales, who sold other photos to the Globe. Will anyone admit they might have made a mistake? No, because they’ll just brush it off by saying, “It sounds like something Crazey and Bozo would do.”

How about this one? While minions of people spend days deciphering the image on the cover of a tabloid that, in my opinion, belongs at the bottom of a birdcage the second it hits the newsstand, no one pays attention to how many curious readers bought that issue and filled the coffers of The American Media Inc Celebrity News Network, its parent company. This is nothing more than a magazine, if it qualifies as one, that has one goal – to shock and titillate its readers. There is nothing wrong with good old fashioned moneymaking, no matter how you get it, right? Wrong. I guess it all hinges on who or what it is. Making money in America is a two-edged sword. It’s split between the thems that deserve it and the thems that don’t. How funny that we do our best to decide for all those thems, whether we can do anything about it or not.

The reason why I don’t care about this very important cruise is because everyone deserves a vacation, including the Anthonys and it saddens me that people won’t allow them to go anywhere. It’s as if they should remain under a constant microscope, while people throw rocks at them. Why? They’ve been through a lot more than most of us will experience in a lifetime. Should they be available at all hours to kick around? Granted, they have said some very nonsensical things, but who are we to deny them basic human rights and freedoms? The court system is there for that. The public has already condemned them.

Here is a very interesting observation by one of this blog’s readers/commenters that perfectly describes the public’s hunger. It is precisely the double standard I take very seriously:

As for Cindy working, how the heck can she? Followed everywhere, constantly ridiculed. People at the Fox blog were reporting her to some professional association… demanding she have her nursing license revoked. SERIOUSLY …. do you want the woman to work or not??? You can’t suck and blow at the same time people. It’s not possible.

By the way, does anyone really care what Morales did with his newfound riches? In most cases, a resounding no. Didn’t he make money off a dead child? Absolutely, yes. Everyone, it seems, is entitled to get rich except the Anthonys. Something is just wrong with this picture. In my opinion, the Anthonys deserve it more than Madison Avenue and it is their choice to do what they want. In reality, they owe us nothing because we have given them nothing but grief and Big Trouble since the news broke. Sure, the pizza box had a lot to do with it, but we are not in charge of their lives and we have no control over their finances. We need to get over that part and move on.

I’m not going after anyone personally. I know plenty of people will agree that any money made off a dead child is just plain wrong. I am merely complaining about no one recognizing anyone and anything else but the Anthonys. Only the Anthonys. I don’t know who paid for the trip and, again, I don’t care. I’m sure, unlike whatever anyone else may think, they needed to get away from this crime. Trust me, I sat close enough to them in court on Friday to see. I briefly spoke to George. They both appeared like two people desperately looking for a break. And needing one. I am also willing to bet you that Morales made a lot more money than the Anthonys did off CBS and he cruised every penny of it to the bank. Did he deserve it? Trust me, there are a lot of people like him out there, we just don’t put any of them under a microscope. Why not? Diane Fanning will get rich off her book, Mommy’s Little Girl. Does anyone complain about that? No, because anyone or anything that shows the Anthonys in a bad light is given a pass. Call it a free cruise.

THIS THREAD IS CLOSED

x

→ 242 CommentsCategories: Casey Anthony · Human Interest
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

“It was my honor, your pleasure…”

October 19, 2009 · 1,002 Comments

For those of you waiting for an important breaking story, I showed that in the video of Joy Wray with her statements about searching the exact location and not finding Caylee where her remains were later found. Because I wanted you to see and hear it, I got the video up as soon as I could. For sure, the interview showed why WESH television journalist and reporter Bob Kealing is the best in central Florida.

There are no revelations in this post. It is just about my experience and observations in the courtroom. There are reasons why I did not put this post up right away, too. Other than for my own personal reasons, I am not really one to grandstand. Most people know by now that Judge Stan Strickland called me up to talk after the hearing ended. Yes, I was the guy in the second row he asked for. What the judge and I discussed was not “breaking news” and, therefore, not something that needed to be released immediately after the event. Sorry, but it was never my intent to rush home and turn my blog into an outlet to publicize myself. I was not seeking my fifteen minutes of fame as some have suggested. I needed to wait until things settled down. What transpired at the end of the hearing was something I will remember for the rest of my life. I am not one to sensationalize. I do not love to blow my own horn. Not too loudly, anyway.

No doubt, I try to be independent, but I will always have a soft spot for the whims of a good woman. It’s definitely one of my traits, as anyone who knows me will probably agree. Stubborn, yes, but a softie at heart. At the same time, it’s very important to point out that there are a lot of good – dare I say great – women who frequent this blog and I am often thrust into acquiescing to some of their strongest wishes or suffer in the ensuing quagmire of “reader’s block” and harsh words if I don’t. Fortunately, we all know how to bend and it’s, more or less, just a way to vent and express how passionate we all are about the Anthony case.

When I mentioned I was going to do my best to go to the latest hearing, I was asked specifically that I not sit on the side of the defense. A lot of folks just don’t like any of the Anthonys. What difference does it make which side of the court I sit on, I wondered? I mean, this wasn’t going to be like a wedding where you tell the usher whether you’re a friend of the bride or groom. Oh, it makes all the difference in the world, I was corrected. Well, I continued, what if I have an opportunity to speak to George or Cindy or anyone else, like Brad Conway? If I am to consider myself a journalist of any kind, shouldn’t I be allowed to write about both sides of a story? I realize we all have bias here, but isn’t it a fact that I have been more than fair and protective of all sides, defense and prosecution? How can I get both sides of a story if I only listen to one? One of the reasons why people come to this blog is because, deep down inside, they are more than fair, too. It’s just tough sometimes, given the evidence we’ve pored over and the fact that emotions do run deep.

As I drove toward downtown Orlando on Friday morning, I wondered what sort of day I would have. Would I even be able to get into the courtroom?

When I got to the courthouse, I went through security and walked straight ahead to the information desk. I wanted to make sure the hearing wasn’t moved from 19-B. Good thing I did, because the nice man behind the desk said it was moved to 10-A. As I entered the courtroom, I glanced left and right. The right side was booked solid. I had to make a decision and I wanted to sit down before the judge walked in. The only seat left was right next to Holly Bristow – someone out to get a story. Obviously, the story was more important to her than where she sat, and later, I heard no complaining about her.

While waiting the long five or so minutes, the courtroom remained silent. There was no friendly banter. I think, like a church, there’s a certain reverence, but instead of God, it’s for the law, courtrooms and judges. It did not stop me from looking around. On the right side, I spotted Bob Kealing in the front row and Kathi Belich a few rows behind him. I sat in the second row on the left, in an aisle seat. Right away, I saw Jose Baez and Andrea Lyon, but where was Casey? Had they not brought her in yet? And where were George and Cindy? I peered around the left side of the person directly in front of me and there was Casey, flanked by her two attorneys. Her neatly combed hair flowed about six inches below her shoulder. Throughout the proceeding, I noticed she would often take her left hand to brush her hair back. Meanwhile, I began to wonder why George and Cindy weren’t there.

ALL RISE

Suddenly, a small entourage of people, including Judge Strickland, entered through a door at the front of the courtroom, to my right. He walked along the wall, between a four foot high partition, and took his seat behind the bench. When Casey stood, I noticed she was wearing a green top with a wide black belt. It appeared the belt came with the blouse. As much as I wanted to look at all of these people as celebrities, I couldn’t help but think they were in this courtroom because of one person. As the proceeding began, I still wondered why George and Cindy weren’t there. I did my best to look all around without it being so awkwardly apparent. Finally, there they were, two seats directly to my left. Sandwiched between Holly and the Anthonys was Jim Lichtenstein, a producer for the NBC Today Show. I chatted with him later. Jim was visible in the Bob Kealing video interview with Joy Wray, standing on the left side of the camera view. He had a very friendly demeanor.

Just as the proceeding began, George and Cindy’s attorney, Brad Conway, entered the courtroom and parked his wheelchair directly to my right. Early into it, Judge Strickland questioned whose courtroom it was because there was hand lotion all over the place. That brought laughter from the crowd, including Casey. Whatever you think about her, it was a comical moment and it seemed to me that it was a simple way for the judge to help the entire courtroom to relax a bit. Judge Strickland apologized and the proceeding continued. Of course, we all know the outcome by now. Casey lost the battle to get her murder case thrown out.

“It’s a farce. It doesn’t even come close to the legal requirements necessary for the court to even entertain a motion to dismiss,” state prosecutor Linda Drane-Burdick argued Friday. “The entire motion, from top to bottom, it is replete with errors, it’s insufficient as a matter of law.”

“It cannot be the intent of the Florida legislature that a person swear to something that they do not have personal knowledge of,” Lyon argued.

“The content of the motion, as well as Ms. Anthony’s brief affirmations, are not enough to carry the day under Florida Rules of Pleading,” Judge Strickland wrote in his order. He ruled (read his order) that Casey had not sworn to the proper and legally required facts to even ask for him to consider dropping the murder and child abuse charges against her. (read motionstate’s response to strike) There is nothing that stops the defense from refiling the motion.

One thing I observed was Andrea Lyon’s very strong voice while arguing against the state’s c4 motion, which was the response to the defense motion to dismiss counts 1 and 2 of the indictment against their client.

Another aspect of the hearing concerned the time the defense argued against turning over evidence yet that showed someone else having dumped Caylee’s body in the woods last year. The judge said he realized that discovery was a rolling process as new witnesses are added, but if Todd Macaluso hadn’t opened a can of worms to begin with, there would be no issue. Because he did, the state should be allowed to see it. You said you have proof. Put up or shut up. The judge gave a deadline of February 1 to turn the evidence over to the state by granting the motion to compel witness list and reciprocal discovery.

As I watched and listened to what was transpiring before me, I tried to glance to my left at Holly without looking like a peeping Tom. I was trying to see how she was making notations. I had brought along my little pocket notebook and I seemed to be writing down information at the same time the real journalists were. She had a legal size pad and what appeared to be a Palm Pilot, where she diligently and quickly entered text. Pretty nifty, I thought. At some point, the judge brought up the Richardson Hearing, of which I had absolutely no knowledge. I still don’t, but it has something to do with defense depositions.

Part of the hearing dealt with those persnickety autopsy photos the defense has yet to see. The judge and prosecutors were mostly concerned with sending them out of state to be viewed by the defense team’s forensic specialists. How could the defense be certain that someone in another state, where Florida laws and court orders don’t apply, wouldn’t release any images to the public. If the photos leave the jurisdiction of the state, the judge said, no court would have jurisdiction over them. He also wondered how anyone could guarantee the images wouldn’t be lost or stolen in transit. It was during this part of the hearing that an idea popped in my head. I wrote it down on my pad and tapped Brad Conway on his arm to show him.

UPLOAD TO SECURE FTP SITE

We briefly exchanged a few very quiet words. What the defense said was that the photographs on the server were unmanageable to print because their experts were “technically challenged.” In other words, too old to learn new computer tricks. They didn’t know, for instance, how to place 2 images side by side for comparison. Don’t laugh, I know a lot of people like that. They may know everything about plant decomposition, but nothing about how to operate sophisticated imaging software. In the end, the state was granted discretion over how and when they would be sent.

Casey will go back to court in December. A pre-trial hearing is scheduled in her check fraud case for December 18. The judge set the trial date in that case to begin on January 25. Her defense team has asked that the trial be moved out of Orange County, but the court has yet to rule on that.

I must be honest with you. As much as you may despise these people, George and Cindy Anthony are a very attractive couple in real life. When the hearing ended, Casey turned around and I saw her face to face as she walked in my direction. No matter how ugly you feel she is inside, she is still a pretty girl. She was short, no doubt, and and not as chunky as her latest jail photos show. She’s still quite petite. I wanted to get an up close and personal look at her and I did. Did she look like a cold-hearted baby killer? I can’t say. Is there a certain look? Did I miss something? All I can tell you is that she was there, and without these charges, she would still be Casey. It didn’t appear that over a year in jail has hardened or aged her.

I turned to Brad Conway again to mention a newspaper article I had read recently. It was Florida Today and it chronicled his past and what compelled him to become an attorney. It was complimentary and well written. I also told him I had something to give him from a private source, something that was sent to me. We discussed it and I had to tell him that I, unfortunately, left it in the car by mistake. He gave me his card and asked me to mail it, which I will do today. I excused myself and turned to George, who was now directly to the left of me. I offered my condolences for his and Cindy’s loss and we exchanged a few pleasantries. I don’t know exactly when and how it happened, but a court bailiff stopped me from leaving. I thought it was protocol, like I was leaving out of turn, similar to a wedding. After it’s over, you leave row by row. She told me to stop and wait. I did. This is the account of my experience. It may not be verbatim, but it is real and true.

“The judge wants to see you.”

“I don’t think so.”

“Hold on. Yes, I’m sure the judge wants to see YOU.”

“Uh, uh, no… I don’t think so. I think you got the wrong guy. Are you sure it’s me and not someone else? I mean, why would the judge want to see me? I don’t think I did anything wrong.” I was completely perplexed and I began to get a little nervous.

“Hang on, I’ll check.” She never left my side and I was almost oblivious to what was going on around me. I must add that at no time did I want to dart from the courtroom, making a hasty escape. But the thought did cross my mind.

Another bailiff came over to her and said yes, HIM. I kept looking at the bailiff and the judge, who was now gesturing for me to step forward. The bailiff opened the gate and I tiptoed my way over to him. He had moved away from the bench, but was still behind that retaining wall, about 4 feet tall.

“Here? Or over at the side?” I asked. I followed him as he moved to my right, nearing the exit door at the front of the courtroom, where he had entered earlier.

We stood looking at each other, with only a mere two feet separating us. Neither one of us had a problem making eye contact. The first thing I noticed was a real sincerity in his eyes.

“Are you Dave?”

“Yes sir, I am.”

“Marinade?”

“Yes sir, that’s me.” I thought that, perhaps, he had tried my marinade years ago and remembered me from one of the many food demos I had done. It turns out, that wasn’t it at all.

Now, some of you may choose not to believe me and you can think whatever you want, but I have absolutely no reason to lie or embellish my story. It’s not going to change my life or yours, but I would appreciate it if you don’t make up stupid stories. I also would be risking my credibility if the judge decided to publicly denounce this in the future. I value my honesty way too much and that was one of the things he addressed.

He told me he was not a computer person, nor was he very good on the Internet. I told him he didn’t need to be. After all, it was not a computer that qualified him to sit on the bench.

“Needless to say, I do go on the Internet and read about this case.” I see no reason whatsoever for him to remain blind to what the outside world, meaning outside of the court system, has to say. Should he cancel his subscription to the Orlando Sentinel and remove all TVs from his house? Would you expect him to sequester himself from the outside world? “I must say that you have the best Web site regarding this case. You investigate and you are very fair to everyone.”

“I thought you were going to ask me to never come back because the glare off my head kept you from concentrating.”

“No, I just wanted to tell you that.”

“I thought, maybe, you had used my marinade years ago.”

“No, you are very good as a writer and you stick to facts. You are very fair and I’m impressed.” WOW! That was impressive. I impressed HIM.

I thanked him to no end. I was in awe of the man. I, we, have watched him in action. His demeanor. His fairness. His elegance on the bench. Let me tell you all something, Judge Strickland is a very humble man. To think that I impressed him was the best compliment I could ever get about my blog. He did not look down upon me. He treated me as a person and that’s the way he looks at Casey and everyone else related to this case; something we have ALL seen in him – his fairness on the bench. I think he looks at blogs and forums the same way. He looks for fairness. After all, he must listen to both sides or he wouldn’t be a good judge at all, would he?

I told him about a friend of mine who was also a judge, but one who heard workman’s compensation cases. When I mentioned his name, he said he knew him. With that, I thanked him again and turned to leave. At that point, I was floating on air and I was bouncing off the walls. I told my story to several people standing outside. That was when I met Michelle. She said, “Wow, I’ve finally met a real celebrity.”

That brought me back down to earth again. I am no celebrity and I told her so. It was a real honor, but I am just a regular old guy. Nothing else.

I left the courtroom and went back to that information desk. I told that same nice man I first spoke with about my great adventure. I was still floating and I must admit, I did a little gloating. I asked him where Casey came out. He said in the basement. They have holding cells and prisoners leave from that location. Can reporters go down there? No, no one is allowed access and she’s already on her way back to the jail. I thanked him and walked toward the front. When I walked out the door, reporters and cameras were waiting. I walked right up to Bob Kealing and told him what had just transpired. He said they all saw me getting called up to the bench. I was not expecting to be interviewed by anyone. Instead, I asked him what they were waiting for. He said the defense team. They’ll walk out this door. I said I didn’t want to miss it. Did I have time to go to the parking garage and retrieve my video camera? He said yes, he was sure.

As I walked to the garage, I was stopped by a woman. “Are you Dave? Marinade Dave?”

“Yes, I am!” I said, proudly. Here I was almost living in the moment of my celebrity world that did not ever exist.

“I’m Joy Wray.” I knew immediately who she was. I told her I was going back to my car to get the camera. We walked together and chatted. We also walked back to the courthouse and a few moments later, Baez & Company walked out. The rest is captured on my video.

After it was all said and done and the morning was winding down, I walked with Bob Kealing to the television trucks, the ones with the towering antennae.

He said, “You’re the one that got James Thompson to open up. I read that. That was really good work. As a matter of fact, we all read your site. You are always fair and honest.”

Yup, that was me, or at least, that’s what I had always hoped people would look at me as. I still do and it’s reassuring to know media people follow blogs. We should all know that, too. He asked me for my card. I told him I ordered some last week, but they weren’t in yet. Instead, he offered one of his. Drats, my cards came in the mail this morning. If only I had ordered them earlier. Anyway, it’s time to get back to work. In the end, I’m still the same old Dave and I noticed I still put my pants on the same way as every other morning. The only thing that’s different? There are a lot more people out there who hate me now. Just remember, like Judge Strickland, I read what others are saying, only I am VERY Internet savvy.

Watch the Video Feed

x

→ 1,002 CommentsCategories: Casey Anthony · Human Interest
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

A Day at the Courthouse

October 17, 2009 · 435 Comments

Since you all know what transpired at the courthouse yesterday, I won’t readdress that on this post. I am just going to show you a video I shot. The press conference with Baez is tough to hear, but I included it anyway. I guess if I plan on getting any more of them, I’ll have to spend some money on a good microphone to thrust into the crowd. I must say, it was a very interesting and learning experience.

Watch a larger version on YouTube

One final thought. I’m sorry I missed the bottom feeders last night. I’m sorry you had to put up with their garbage.  There were three of them using the same Whatever Dave name. Whatever. One came from Paramount, California. One came from Seattle, Washington, another from Kent, Washington, and last but not least, the final one came from Houston, Texas. How interesting that none of them showed their real names. Cowards are like that. Don’t worry, idiots like that never come back. They are afraid to.

In any event, I understand that this sort of thing comes with the territory. Some people hate to see someone else get what they think they deserve. The sad thing is, I seek no fame and I make no money from this. All they are doing is exposing their weaknesses of the flesh, not to mention their own blatant hypocrisy. I just think it’s very peculiar that they made up a name instead of being honest and standing their ground. Then, I could have respected them. Today, they are nothing more than worthless slime.


→ 435 CommentsCategories: Casey Anthony · Human Interest
Tagged: , , , , , , , ,

A great day for courting

October 16, 2009 · 278 Comments

Today, I am going to try to get into the court hearing for Casey Anthony. If I am successful, I will have a report later on or in the morning. In any event, I will not be around to answer any comments and if any of them get caught in spam, I won’t be able to let them out until I return.

x

→ 278 CommentsCategories: Casey Anthony · Human Interest
Tagged: , , , , , , ,

A 6 minute drive?

October 14, 2009 · 241 Comments

Just a little reminder…

Casey was indicted on a first-degree murder charge, among others, one year ago on this day.

One of the things that continues to bug me about this case is people’s interpretation of Orlando and Florida in general. For example, if the recorded low temperature of Orlando on June 16 of last year was 72º, which it was for about 5 minutes, it manifests itself into being 70º and instead of 4:oo in the morning, it becomes the daytime high. Another thing, too many people take Google Maps to heart. Type in point A and point B and it spits out drive times based on… no red lights and zero traffic. Hardly anyone takes morning drive, rush hour and accidents into consideration. To drive around in metropolitan Orlando, you must possess unfathomable patience and an angelic temperament. It’s a very diverse state. People come from all over and they bring with them their own rules of the road.

Those are good examples of intangibles. You cannot feel them, touch them or experience any of them unless you live here. A daytime high of 90ºF may, in fact, feel like 105ºF because of the extreme humidity on that day and the intensity of the sun, which is much more direct than it is elsewhere. We are a lot closer to the equator. Just because the sun sets, we can’t assume the temperature dips 40ºF. Do not think the humidity magically disappears. No ifs, ands, or buts, Florida is a hot state.

My reason for writing this post is not to denigrate anyone who makes unsubstantiated claims, it is merely to point out that one cannot believe everything because Google and Map Quest say so. We cannot take times and temperatures and other assorted facts and distort them so they fit into our own personal theory of events. Just like there were no interior doors at the Casselberry Wal-Mart, no one can rightly assume Casey and Caylee took a side door instead because that was never brought into the equation to begin with. Where was it written or stated that Casey stopped and bought a soda in the nearby machine? Or gum? Or candy? Meanwhile, the focus should be on whether Casey and Caylee were even there that day based on factual information and what we know to be true.

Anyway, this gave me a perfect excuse to get out of the house and give you a little bit more of a guided tour. Here are two videos that show the drive from Sutton Place Apartment Homes, where Tony Lazzaro lived at the time, to the Casselberry Wal-Mart, in real time. I calculated it to be around 14 minutes, give or take. Bear in mind, my trip was at 2:00 pm in the afternoon. Traffic really starts to swell around 3:30, but I did not wish to put myself through heavy congestion. You also get to see more of the Orlando area. I started at Sutton Place and headed west on University Blvd. I crossed over Forsyth Rd. and turned right, or north, on SR 436, also known as Semoran Blvd., which is a combination of Seminole and Orange, the two counties it passes through. Heading north, I crossed over Aloma Ave. Where part 1 of the video ends and part 2 begins, there is a CVS Pharmacy on the right. It’s on the corner lot at the intersection of Howell Branch Road. There, Casey could have purchased her “private” stash of personal items instead of going way out of her way to get to Wal-Mart. She could have easily circled around by coming back down Forsyth.

A couple of blocks east of Sutton Place, on University Blvd., was a movie theater at the intersection of Goldenrod Road. There was down time on Casey’s cell phone that afternoon of June 16, 2008. While I am not suggesting that she went to see a movie that day, I decided to look around. Unfortunately, the cinema is now closed and the manager of the Family Dollar next door told me it had been for 6 months. I wanted to find out what as playing that day and I based my decision to explore on the fact that Casey liked movies. She and Tony were videotaped at Blockbuster later that evening and Casey had time on her hands while he was in school.

PICT0093

Had I found out a thrasher movie was playing that day, I wouldn’t necessarily assume Casey was there because she now sits in a jail cell charged with her daughter’s murder. All I wanted to know was whether it was a possibility because down time on a cell phone could mean that she couldn’t talk to anyone while inside.

In any event, here are two videos that chronicle my drive. I hope you like Liberace.

Watch Part 1 on YouTube

Watch Part 2 on YouTube


→ 241 CommentsCategories: Casey Anthony · Human Interest
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Exhibits and Memorandums and Motions, Oh My

October 13, 2009 · 213 Comments

Here are brief explanations of yesterday’s news regarding papers filed by the defense:

• EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR CHANGE OF VENUE

• MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR CHANGE OF VENUE

• MOTION FOR CHANGE OF VENUE

In this area, Judge Strickland will take 3 things into consideration when he reviews the exhibits.

1. The Quantity and Timing of Pretrial Publicity.
2. The Nature of the Publicity (Factual v. Prejudicial).
3. Admissibility of Content of Media Accounts.

Changes of venue motions can be filed for both civil and criminal acts. All states vary regarding a change of venue. The New Jersey legislation, for example, requires that the site chosen for a change of venue have the same demographics as the scene of the crime. However, California law requires only that the judge consider demographic factors. Even without changes in the law, recent judicial decisions regarding change of venue and voir dire reflect concern about jury fairness.

In Florida law, under Statute 910.03, criminal prosecutions shall be tried in the county where the offense was committed. In order to protect the defendant’s due process rights, the court, upon a motion of any party, shall give priority to any county which closely resembles the demographic composition of the county wherein the original venue would lie.

If a court finds that a fair and impartial jury cannot be impaneled in the county where the offense was committed, and the court determines that once a jury is selected it shall be sequestered, the court on its own motion, or upon a motion of any party, may elect to select a jury from a county other than where the offense was committed. Upon completion of jury selection, the jury shall be brought for trial to the county where the offense was committed.

read the motion for change of venue


• EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JURY QUESTIONNAIRE FILED

The defense wants potential jurors to answer a 10-page questionnaire. Some of the questions will include whether they have heard about Anthony, her defense attorneys and/or the prosecutors.

• EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR INDIVIDUALLY SEQUESTERED JURY VOIR DIRE FILED

Voir dire is the first opportunity the attorneys have to establish personal contact with prospective jurors and the only occasion they have to enter into a dialogue with jurors. It has been repeatedly observed that “prospective jurors do not respond in the same manner to inquiry by a judge as they do to questions by counsel,” and that when responding to a question asked by the judge a prospective juror is more likely to provide a response designed to “please the judge” than to be completely candid.

• EXHIBITS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE THE INTRODUCTION OF ANY EVIDENCE RELATING TO MISS ANTHONY’S MURDER CASE

• EXIBITS IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF ALLEGED PRIOR BAD ACTS

• MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF ALLEGED PRIOR BAD ACTS

• DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE FILED TO PRECLUDE THE INTRODUCTION OF ANY EVIDENCE RELATING TO MISS ANTHONY’S MURDER CASE

• MOTION IN LIMINE FILED TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF ALLEGED PRIOR BAD ACTS

• MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE THE INTRODUCTION OF ANY EVIDENCE RELATING TO MISS ANTHONY’S MURDER CASE

In Limine motions are standard. Evidence that is potentially damaging because it is inflammatory, prejudicial, or likely to evoke sympathy without being probative can be excluded by a motion in limine, as can irrelevant evidence or other matters that would be excluded after a proper objection. In addition to reducing the risk of exposing the jury to inadmissible, inflammatory, or irrelevant evidence, motion in limine avoids repeated objections or sidebar conferences in the course of the trial. It also prevents cautionary instructions to the jury which, rather than erasing the evidence from a jury’s mind, may call the jury’s attention to it. Motions in limine may also seek admission of evidence. Such motions usually help to arrange the details for advance planning, such as the jury’s visiting a site to observe evidence, rather than to help strategic planning. The benefit of an in limine ruling that admits rather than excludes evidence is that it save the unnecessary expense of preparing special exhibits or producing distant witnesses for trial. Where there is a question as to whether certain evidence is admissible, an in limine ruling may also help a lawyer avoid interjecting unnecessary reversible error into the trial.

• BLANK JUROR INFORMATION SHEET FILED

• MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JURY QUESTIONAIRE

• MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR INDIVIDUALLY SEQUESTERED JURY VOIR DIRE

• MOTION FOR INDIVIDUALLY SEQUESTERED JURY VOIR DIRE

These will be utilized to predict jury impartiality. The defense is pointing to extensive pre-trial publicity as a reason why they want to question potential jury members individually (see below motion for individually sequestered jury voir dire) and not as a group. They do not want jurors to be reluctant to answer questions truthfully in front of others.

In the United States, voir dire generally refers to the process by which prospective jurors are questioned about their backgrounds and potential biases before being chosen to sit on a jury. It also refers to the process by which expert witnesses are questioned about their backgrounds and qualifications, in order to potentially give an expert opinion in court testimony. As defined by Gordon P. Cleary: “Voir Dire is the process by which attorneys select, or perhaps more appropriately reject, certain jurors to hear a case.

See the questionnaire


• MOTION FOR ADMISSION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE

Pro hac vice, Latin for “for this occasion” or “for this event,” (literally, “for this turn”) is a legal term usually referring to a lawyer who has not been admitted to practice in a certain jurisdiction but has been allowed to participate in a particular case in that jurisdiction.

The right to appear pro hac vice is not guaranteed. Rather, the attorney wanting to practice in a jurisdiction within which he or she is not licensed must specifically request permission from the court to be able to appear as an attorney of record. This is accomplished with a motion to appear pro hac vice, in which an attorney who is licensed in the jurisdiction requests that the non-licensed attorney be admitted to practice in a particular case.

In addition to the motion, the non-licensed attorney is typically required to provide the court with a statement from his local bar association indicating that he is a member in good standing and also pay a small fee to the local bar association.

Read the Motion for Admission to appear pro hac vice

x

→ 213 CommentsCategories: Casey Anthony · Human Interest
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , ,

A couple of quick updates

October 12, 2009 · 174 Comments

48hoursmystery

On CBS this coming Saturday, October 17…

The Untold Story of Caylee Anthony

New revelations in the murder of Orlando toddler Caylee Anthony.

10:00 pm ET/PT

and…

jacshead

9th Judicial Circuit
JUDGE STAN STRICKLAND
DIVISION 35
HEARING ROOM 17-B
COURTROOM 19-B (TRIALS ONLY)

——————- Schedule for Friday, October 16, 2009 ——————-
9:30 am 15 min Case: 48-2008-CF-15606-O- Motion: VARIOUS MOTIONS
STATE OF FLORIDA

LINDA DRANE BURDICK, ESQ.

vs. CASEY MARIE ANTHONY

JOSE BAEZ, ESQ.

PLTF ATTY #: 1) FIRST DEGREE MURDER (CAPITAL) DEFT ATTY #: 03/18/1986 W/F
Notes: 5) FALSE INFORMATION TO LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER DURING INVESTIGATION (M1) 6) FALSE INFORMATION TO LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER DURING INVESTIGATION (M1) 7) FALSE INFORMATION TO LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER DURING INVESTIGATION (M1)

(I will do my best to attend this hearing and file a report later in the day)

x

→ 174 CommentsCategories: Casey Anthony · Human Interest
Tagged: , , , , , , , , , ,